Reclaiming the Parthenon marbles

“We are at the turn of the 19th Century. Napoleon is pondering the risk of invading England. He decides that it is not a very good idea. Instead he invades Egypt, wresting it from Turkish authority. The Turks don’t appreciate this at all. They break off diplomatic relations with France. They also declare war. Britain decides that this is a dandy time to appoint an Ambassador to Turkey.

Enter Lord Elgin. It is he who gets the job. He has just married pretty Mary Nisbett and is finishing his fine country house. Its architect tells him of the wonders of Greek architecture and sculptures, and suggests it would be a marvellous idea to make plaster casts of the actual objects in Athens. “Marvellous, indeed,” says Elgin. He sets about organising a group of people who could make architectural drawings, headed by a worthy painter, who turns out to be Giovanni Lusieri, an Italian painter.[…]

Elgin’s staff of artists arrive in Athens. To control Athens the Turks have assigned two governors, one civil, the other military. Much has been said and continues to be said of what little concern the Turks had for the Acropolis treasures. Yet, it took six months for the Elgin staff to be allowed access. But they worked it out; five pounds a visit into the palm of the military governor. This inaugurated a procedure of bribery and corruption of officials that was not to stop until the marbles were packed and shipped to England.

Yet, when scaffolding was erected and moulds were ready to be made, suddenly came rumours of French preparation for military action. The Turkish governor ordered the Elgin staff down from the Acropolis. Five pounds a visit or not, access to the Acropolis was verboten . There was only one way to get back up there again; for Lord Elgin to use his influence with the Sultan in Constantinople, to obtain a document, called a firman , ordering the Athens authorities to permit the work to go on.[…]

No sooner was the firman delivered to Athens, than a feverish, terrifying assault is made upon an edifice that, until today, many consider the purest, the most beautiful of human creation…”


Pediment statue which is in the British Museum
Pediment statue which is in the British Museum


The above text is part of a long speech made by Melina Merkouri – a beautiful and powerful woman, a well-known singer, actress and politician who, at that time, had been appointed minister of culture – to the Oxford Union in 1986. The topic on debate was the return of the Parthenon Marbles to Greece. She ended her speech thus:

“You must understand what the Parthenon Marbles mean to us. They are our pride. They are our sacrifices. They are our noblest symbol of excellence. They are a tribute to the democratic philosophy. They are our aspirations and our name . They are the essence of Greekness.

We are ready to say that we rule the entire Elgin enterprise as irrelevant to the present. We say to the British government: you have kept those sculptures for almost two centuries. You have cared for them as well as you could, for which we thank you. But now in the name of fairness and morality, please give them back. I sincerely believe that such a gesture from Great Britain would ever honour your name.”


Melina Merkouri with her husband Jules Dassin
Melina Merkouri with her husband Jules Dassin


The Parthenon Marbles, designed and executed by the sculptor Pheidias to adorn the Parthenon, are perhaps the greatest of all classical sculptures. When, in 1801, Lord Elgin, then ambassador to the Turkish government, had chunks of the frieze sawn off and shipped to England, these were seized by Parliament and sold to the British Museum to help pay off Elgin’s debts.

Greece has sought the return of the sculptures ever since victory in the War of Independence in 1832. During the war, Greek fighters even gave bullets to Ottoman soldiers besieged on the Acropolis because they were damaging the Parthenon by removing lead fittings to make ammunition after running out. However, the British Museum has so far refused to consider the request, on the grounds that the marbles had been legally acquired. Greece does not accept this, arguing that the firman giving Lord Elgin permission to take the marbles was never actually produced, and that in any case, it was issued by an occupying force.

The British Museum also maintained that Athens did not possess a fitting place to house the marbles. It is true that until recently the Acropolis museum was a small and cramped place (I remember the boredom of tramping around it on school trips – dusty statues lined against the walls) but the fact is that the marbles which remained in Athens are in much better shape today than those in London, having been restored by cutting-edge laser technology. Meanwhile, the ones in the custody of the British Museum have suffered both deliberate and accidental damage, a fact acknowledged by Dr Ian Jenkins, chief curator of the museum.

As for lack of fitting space, this argument has been emphatically trumped by the opening in 2009 of the New Acropolis Museum whose innovative design, the work of Swiss-born architect Bernard Tschumi, offers a sweeping 360-degree view of the Acropolis. In a Times article dated August 27, the museum was described as “one of the most beautiful exhibition spaces in modern architecture”.


The Caryatids in the Acropolis Museum (NAM, AKTOR, 29JUN2009)
The Caryatids in the Acropolis Museum (NAM, AKTOR, 29JUN2009)


While government is still prevaricating, the British people are more relaxed about returning the marbles (today, a majority supports reunification.)

In 1983, in response to Melina Merkouri’s appeal for repatriation of the marbles, a campaigning body called the British Committee for the Reunification of the Parthenon Marbles ­was set up. Eleni Cubitt, its secretary, says: “The Parthenon Sculptures deserve to be housed in the New Acropolis Museum. Currently they are a fragmented piece of art, yet as one significant piece, visitors will be able to see the whole as it ought to be seen, in context, at the foot of the Acropolis itself.”

The English writer Christopher Hitchens also joined the fight in 1983, by writing an article on the subject for the Spectator. In 1987 he wrote his polemic, The Elgin Marbles, now retitled The Parthenon Marbles: The Case for Reunification. Hitchens insisted the Greeks have “a natural right” to the sculptures, and that they belong on the hill of the Acropolis – “in that light, in that air. Pentelic marble does not occur in the UK.”

While both Mercouri and Hitchens have since died, the battle goes on, under the benign leadership of the Acropolis museum director, Professor Demetrios Padermalis.
In a recent article in the Kathimerini daily paper, Padermalis explains that his strategy is strictly scientific, avoiding fanfare, and instead using low key discussions and thoughtful reasoning. He maintains a scientific dialogue with the British Museum, in keeping with his credo that the Acropolis Museum is before all a place of learning. Of course, the matter of the return of the marbles has always had a political dimension; in 2014 the Greek government hired the high-profile human rights lawyer Amal Clooney and her colleagues to secure the return of the Parthenon Marbles – a momentous mission. However, they have since backed off, fearing a negative decision by the courts would permanently wreck Athens’ chances of having the marbles returned. Financial considerations also played a part in this decision, given the country is in an acute state of crisis.


The French Romantic poet Alphonse de Lamartine once described the work  as “the most perfect poem ever written in stone on the surface of the earth”.


Meanwhile, in 2008, in a gesture of goodwill, Italy returned a fragment, a 14-by-13-inch artifact consisting of a foot and part of a dress hem from a sculpture of Aphrodite, the goddess of love. The 2,500-year-old section of marble was presented to the Greek government by Italy’s president, Giorgio Napolitano.This is not the first piece from the Parthenon sculptures to be returned, since another, smaller piece was offered by Heidelberg University two years previously.
Padermalis remarks that politics are not within the museum’s sphere of influence. The feeling I got from reading the Kathimerini article is that Padermalis disapproves of the bombastic tones the government used in this matter, believing that this does not help the cause. He prefers the viewer – the millions of visitors coming to the museum – to see for himself the esthetic problems caused by the fragmentation of the marbles. The unity of a wonderful work of art has been broken, by being divided between Athens and London.

Padermalis uses concrete examples to reinforce his point of view. In one part of the frieze, a centaur is grabbing a Lapith woman by the waist, in a violent scene of rape. But the woman’s foot is in the British museum, where a visitor can never comprehend, by seeing this lone foot, the dramatic tension of this scene. In another part, Kekrops, the first mythical king of Athens, had a snake by his feet, to symbolise the fact that he was indigenous to Athens (the snake was a guardian of the natives). But the snake is in London – another fragmented scene, which thus loses much of its impact.

The new Acropolis museum is a magical place, meriting a trip to Athens just for its own sake. It is full of light and wonderful perspectives. Walking in, one finds oneself stepping onto a glass floor, through which can be seen the ruins of the ancient city of Athens. There are treasures on view at every step, and the top floor is an exact replica in shape and size of the Parthenon so that the metopes can be seen as close to their original form as possible. The walls are glass, through which the Parthenon can be admired, a short distance away. Light streams in, making for an unforgettable experience.


The entrance of theAcropolis Museum
The entrance of theAcropolis Museum


I have had the pleasure and of meeting professor Padermalis, and his enthusiasm and passion for his work are infectious. He never tires of showing people around and explaining his latest projects, one of which is reconstituting the colors of the statues (on replicas, not on the original statues!) Minute quantities of paint remain on the statues, enabling a close approximation, which appears shockingly garish to the modern viewer, who is used to the beauty of the bare marble.

The case is ongoing: this year, a cross-party group of British MPs has launched a fresh bid to return the marbles to Greece on the 200th anniversary of the British Government’s decision to buy them — a move that campaigners said could help the UK secure a better deal during the Brexit talks with the EU. But the matter also provokes an interesting debate: should all works of art be returned to their country of origin? Would this cause  a huge upheaval in major museums? Personally, I don’t think one can generalize – it should be a case by case matter, depending on the rarity of the work, the situation in the home country (Palmyra comes to mind, but could Palmyra have been transported elsewhere?) and other factors.

International organizations can and are helping with the preservation of monuments where possible. Casts and copies can be made. Also, in some cases, such as Greek and Roman antiquities, there are so many of them that more could foreseeable be loaned to museums around the world rather than stay unseen in storerooms.



31 thoughts on “Reclaiming the Parthenon marbles”

  1. I think they should come home…. because that’s what it’s all about, really. They are out of their proper place. A copy would do just as well in London, and it would be a humane and generous gesture to restore to Greece one of its most outstanding artistic achievements at a time when Greece needs pride in its achievements.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. The idea of chopping something so exquisite to pieces is mindboggling. Mind you, covering the statuary with brightly coloured paint also seems like an assault on their beauty. I suppose tastes have changed, although I don’t imagine anyone is so aesthetically impaired as to think any work of art looks its best when scattered across an entire continent!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. And yet, at the time they were painted. Lots of red, blue and gold. It’s fascinating seeing the reconstruction on replicas (they made a few, and put them next to the actual statue to show the contrast.) Quite shocking. Different esthetics – and let’s not forget, at the time it was their ‘modern art’!


  3. Any issue such as this is ‘case by case’! In this instance, this is a matter of ‘nollo contendere’ in my mind: yes, of course they are overdue home! Thank you so much for the clearest and simplest historical detail about the Elgin Marbles I have ever read . . . love the look of the Acropolis Museum . . . what a fitting home . . . . and a chance of a wonderful stopover in Athens even if time is short . . .

    Liked by 1 person

  4. It’s a tricky one. Personally, I think we should return them, but I do understand why the museums are frightened by the thought of opening a huge can of worms, since they’re all filled to the brim with stuff that came from all around the world. There’s a part of me that says if everything went back to the countries of origin, then museums would be dull places indeed. But I agree that to chop bits off in the first place was truly an unforgiveable act…

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I find the British Museum a rather uncomfortable place to visit – it’s amazing and fascinating, but I always have the underlying feeling of it being a colonial relic. Of course it does contain many objects that really do belong, but things like the Parthenon Marbles just feel to me like loot. I would love for them to be returned, let’s hope it won’t be too long before they are.
    As for the paint, I was quite taken aback when we went to see the terracotta army to discover that the warriors were originally painted. The mock-up of what an original would have looked like was amazingly gaudy.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Fascinating, isn’t it? And unexpected. The problem with the British Museum is that it’s old-fashioned, like the Louvre. We are now used to a more modern esthetic. And I suppose it’s difficult and very expensive to change them.


  6. I love visiting the British Museum both to marvel at its contents and to enjoy the design and space of the building. However, there is no escaping the question of how this treasure trove came to be here. It is the collected haul of Britain’s thirst for Imperial conquest and that shouldn’t be forgotten. I don’t feel it is necessary to avoid the museum because of what it houses, because seeing all these riches together really drives the point home of the scale of Britain’s grand Imperial plundering.When people in the UK talk about making Britain ‘great’ again, I often wonder what they mean. Was Britain ‘great’ when it was invading, conquering and seizing other nations’ property? I just feel shame. For me, the marbles should return to Athens, no question.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I don’t think one should feel shame about something that happened in the past, each era has its own problems. We Greeks are very proud of Alexander the Great, but he did a lot of plundering and conquering as well as bringing civilization to different places. The question is, what is appropriate to our times… when I visited Berlin, I had the same thoughts looking at the Ishtar Gate and the head of Nefertiti…

      Liked by 1 person

  7. I’m of the opinion that treasures should be returned to their home countries. We met with an Australian Aboriginal anthropologist a few years ago and his passion was working to retrieve artifacts from overseas. It was a privilege to be able to see and hold pieces that we’d only ever read about in books. Keep up the good work!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Speaking as someone from England, and originally from London, where i have had the pleasure of viewing these works, I feel that they should be returned without further debate. They were stolen, for want of a better description, and the new museum is the perfect place for them to be seen at their best, and in the city where they belong.
    I have previously signed a petition urging our government to return them, but regrettably I have no influence. Keep up the campaigning, and let’s hope they will be home soon.
    Best wishes, Pete.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Return them. End of. And if it opens up a whole can of worms with many countries all wanting back what was stolen from them? So what? Replicas can be displayed, indistinguishable from the originals. And goodwill would be generated.

    Everyone’s a winner.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I suppose people thought differently at various times in history. And perhaps some antiquities did get saved this way. But I think Elgin was an aristocrat in debt and was interested in making some cash. Also now there is no excuse for not returning things where there is a suitable Museum to show them in their natural surroundings.

      Liked by 1 person

I’d love to hear what you think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: